Putting this near the top of a marketing page is unusual. It is here because the four gaps below disqualify a large number of perfectly reasonable projects, and finding that out after you have paid and rebuilt a site is a worse experience than reading it now.
- You need a blog or a content system. There is no CMS. Pages are designed, not generated from entries, so a site that publishes regularly means editing the design every time. If your site is mostly writing, this is the wrong tool.
- You need to sell something. There is no e-commerce; it is listed as upcoming with no date. A photographer selling prints, an artist selling work, or a shop of any kind needs the transaction to happen on a platform built for it, with this site linking out to it.
- You need a second language. Multiple languages are not supported.
- You need several people editing at once. Real-time co-editing is listed as upcoming. Teammate roles and version history exist, but the simultaneous editing you are used to in Figma stays in Figma.
One more that is less obvious and catches people out: layout works to three fixed breakpoints rather than fluidly. For most portfolio and marketing sites that is plenty, and it makes the result predictable. For a design that needs to reflow continuously across every width, it is a real constraint, and how the breakpoints work is worth reading before you commit.
If none of those is a problem, the rest of the site is the detail: how the Figma import works, what is in each plan, what it costs, and how it compares to the alternatives.
