-
How to lay it out.
Design once and adjust twice. Designing three sites is how a two-day job becomes a two-week one.
Finish the desktop layout first.
Switch to the next width down.
Reflow columns, reset the type.
Repeat at the narrowest width.
Publish, then check on hardware.
-
What actually changes at each width
Finish the desktop page first, then switch to the next width down and repair what the narrower canvas broke, then do the same at the narrowest one. What Siter.io calls each of the three views, and how wide each is drawn, is not documented anywhere we can cite, so read both off the canvas. The app is the authoritative source and this page is not.
Before a long pass, settle one question: make a small change at the desktop width, switch views, and see whether it carried. Siter.io does not document which properties inherit between breakpoints, and the answer decides whether you work top-down or treat each width as its own layout. Five minutes here saves an afternoon of redoing edits in the wrong order.
Then the usual list, roughly in the order it bites. Anything carrying a hard width wider than the narrowest canvas. Rows of two or three columns that need to become one. Display type set for a wide canvas. Padding that read as generous at desktop and eats a phone screen. And images exported at the size of a desktop column — whether Siter.io serves a smaller file to a narrow screen is not documented, so size the export for the box it actually sits in rather than assuming something downscales it for you.
Do not make hiding your main tool. Whether an element can be hidden at one width only is not documented, so check it in the app before planning a layout around it — and a narrow view built from fewer, larger elements reads better than a desktop view with half of it switched off.
The last step is not optional. A page can look finished in every view on the canvas and still be unusable in the hand, which is what the published URL on a real phone is for.